Current:Home > reviewsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -Keystone Growth Academy
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:35:08
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (21)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- BP Oil and Gas Leaks Under Control, but Alaskans Want Answers
- Exodus From Canada’s Oil Sands Continues as Energy Giants Shed Assets
- Tori Spelling Says Mold Infection Has Been Slowly Killing Her Family for Years
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- This week on Sunday Morning (June 18)
- Why Halle Bailey Says Romance With Rapper DDG Has Been Transformative
- Arizona to halt some new home construction due to water supply issues
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Activist Judy Heumann led a reimagining of what it means to be disabled
Ranking
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- These Texas DAs refused to prosecute abortion. Republican lawmakers want them stopped
- Auto Industry Pins Hopes on Fleets to Charge America’s Electric Car Market
- Trump’s EPA Fast-Tracks a Controversial Rule That Would Restrict the Use of Health Science
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- New EPA Rule Change Saves Industry Money but Exacts a Climate Cost
- Global Warming Was Already Fueling Droughts in Early 1900s, Study Shows
- Coronavirus ‘Really Not the Way You Want To Decrease Emissions’
Recommendation
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Kim Zolciak Requests Kroy Biermann Be Drug Tested Amid Divorce Battle
Ja Morant suspended for 25 games without pay, NBA announces
Losing Arctic Ice and Permafrost Will Cost Trillions as Earth Warms, Study Says
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Vanderpump Rules’ Ariana Madix Addresses Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Breakup Rumors
How a New White House Memo Could Undermine Science in U.S. Policy
How a New White House Memo Could Undermine Science in U.S. Policy